Tomb Of Safdarjung, Delhi, India


The site is deserted, even at midday. The ₹5 entrance fee (Since hiked. See updated travel logistics below) is almost an apology, even without the elevated status of a royal tomb.

This “last flicker in the lamp of Mughal architecture” is the final resting place of the erstwhile Nawab of Avadh: Mirza Muqim Abul Mansur Khan, also known as Safdarjung, whose exceptional service to emperor Ahmad Shah elevated him to Grand Vizier (Prime Minister) in 1748. His excessive ambition cost him that privilege in 1753.

He was banished to Avadh and only returned to Delhi posthumously thanks to his son Shujaud Daula, who wangled permission from the Mughal court to lay him to rest at this spot.

Tomb of Safdarjung, Delhi

The prominent and ornamental gate frames the monument, that at first glance holds a strong resemblance to its star cousin: the mausoleum of emperor Humayun. It is similar in colour and follows the charbagh (quadrilateral walled garden) style of construction divided by water channels.

As you walk in however, you notice the marked absence of refinement. The skewed proportions, the elongated facade, the bulbous dome and its mismatched stone cladding mark a disappointing epilogue to the grand legacy of Mughal architecture in India. In many ways it is said to be a reflection of its times. Of the degenerate lifestyles of lesser emperors and the decline of a great empire. whose famed coffers had been cleaned out by a daring Persian raid.

The Abyssinian architect possibly meant it to be as pristine as its iconic predecessor in Agra. But he had no access to the quarries – by then under the control of Jat chieftans – nor the funds. So he was forced to make do with scavenged material from nearby tombs. And resort to almost Moorish arabesque plaster work to adorn the interiors in place of traditional pietra dura..

In The City Of Djinns, William Dalrymple spares no adjective in deriding the monument’s shortcomings: “The spirit is fecund, Bacchanalian, almost orgiastic. Like some elderly courtesan, the tomb tries to mask its imperfections beneath thick layers of make-up; its excesses of ornament are worn like over-applied rouge.”

That, to my mind, is as exaggerated as the ornamentation. Safdarjung’s tomb isn’t perfect. But viewed singularly and without bias it is quite beautiful. And nothing justifies its neglect* or that Rs.5 entrance fee**.

The beautifully decorated gate. The ASI maintains a library in the rooms above.
The beautifully decorated gate. The ASI maintains a library in the rooms above.


Painted detailing on top of gate.
Painted detailing on top of gate.
Plaster detailing on the ceiling
Pietra Dura on the threshold.
Wide view of interior arches and plaster detailing on ceiling
Interior arches and plaster detailing on ceiling.

*The discovery of a buried drainage system has spurred the ASI (Archaeological Survey of India) to restart the fountains. That’s a beginning! 

The ASI has also recently begun illuminating the tomb every evening from 19:30 to 11 pm. Visitors are, sadly, not allowed inside during this time but it is possible to view and photograph it from outside.

** Since hiked. See below for latest info.



Delhi, like much of the subcontinent, is best visited in early spring and autumn. February, March and October, November are the ideal months.


Lodhi Garden and Humayun’s tomb are easily combined with a visit to the tomb of Safdarjung. Visit Humayun’s tomb early to avoid crowds at the more popular site.


Safdarjung Tomb Visitng Hours: 07.00-17.00 (Illuminated from 19.30 – 24.00 but entry not permitted after 17.00.)
Safdarjung Tomb Entrance Fee: ₹15/- for Indians, ₹200/- for (Non SAARC) Foreigners
Photography charges: Free
Videography: Rs 25

Posted by

Madhu is an Interior designer turned travel blogger on a long sabbatical to explore the world. When not crafting stories on The Urge To Wander, she's probably Tweeting @theurgetowander or sharing special moments on

84 thoughts on “Tomb Of Safdarjung, Delhi, India

  1. It looks a totally fascinating place, Mahdu. That first shot is so dramatic. I think Dalrymple got a little carried away with his old courtesan conceit. Not really appropriate in all sorts of ways.

    1. My thoughts exactly Tish. I am no expert on the history of Delhi, but I thought quite a few of Dalrymple’s deductions in the book were over the top. Yes, the monument is fascinating and deserves a little more care and attention.

  2. Nice work, Madhu. I didn’t see this one, but I went to Humayun’s Tomb instead, which I think is the other side of the Lodhi Gardens (not sure exactly). They look very similar from the outside, but great to get a glimpse of Mughal mausoleum architecture!

    1. Thanks Lee. Humayun’s tomb is towards the opposite end of Lodi road, and certainly the unmissable monument of the two. Did you go after the 2013 re-opening? The Aga Khan trust has done a remarkable job of the restoration.

  3. It is so impressive the beauty of the past and the amount of talent/devotion that went into these incredible structures…even though tombs are always a bit strange to me 🙂 Beautiful work Madhu (both writing and photography)!

    1. Thank you Randall. Considering the number of dynasties that have passed through Delhi it isn’t surprising that it is strewn with tombs. I am always fascinated too over the effort and wealth invested into showing off a person’s status long after he is gone. And these aren’t even meant for the afterlife as in Egypt 🙂

      1. So true, and the amount of wealth for something that at least in my eyes is a bit irrelevant (status after death to me is a bit frightening in terms of understand self and ego)…and yes, Egypt is a whole other story!

  4. It may be unfinished and unrefined (according to Dalrymple) but has a mysterious beauty of its own. Haven’t visited it but wished I had. You had no problem not getting people in these shots. 🙂

    1. Ha, no problem at all Lynne! Strange how we complain when there are people around and complain when there aren’t! 🙂

  5. Great post, Madhu. What a beautiful place to be interred! I love the ornate gate and library building, and that plasterwork on the ceilings is phenomenal. I must show the photos to hubby and see if he can copy it. 😀

  6. As always I enjoyed the photos and learning of The Tomb Of Safdarjung. It never ceases to amaze me how much artistry went into architecture all over the world then and how little there is now. Thank you for sharing it. -Max-

  7. Surprisingly, a archiecture beautiful !! the ceiling is extraordinary! thank you for this visit and sharing!

  8. They do say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, Madhu, but I struggle to see how anyone could fail to find this beautiful. That ceiling is wonderful, and the delicately traced inlays… I could live with it 🙂

    1. I think he means it in a relative sense Jo. As in what a come down it is from the perfection of the Taj. But I didn’t think it merited all those adjectives 🙂

  9. Oh dear, I have to imagine it’s the thought that counts but the humiliation of resting forever in a substandard tomb does let the side down . . .

    1. The ignominy of it…..poor Safdarjung! The fact that the road in front and a defence airport nearby bear his name, might have been some consolation 😀

  10. Considering it’s not nearly as large or grand as the Taj Mahal, it’s still exquisitely done, all that detailed work inside. The arch of the gates look like peacock feathers, almost.

  11. Wow. Loved it in totality. Lets forget Dalrymple and enjoy the heritage of delhi the way it should be appreciated. Have an urge to visit this place. Thanks for sharing and giving me a subject for my Delhi Diary.

    1. There were more adjectives that I didn’t include Angeline – like ‘blowzy’ for example – but fluffy didn’t make it to the list! 😀

  12. Beautiful shots, Madhu. And I enjoyed the bit of history and more importantly the details about the architecture. I Can see the moorish elements, similar to some of the work in the alcazar in Seville and Alhambra in Granada. it is an absolute pity that we don’t value our own historical heritage 😦 they really need to update the pricing… Which I think they have kept as is to make it accessible to all sections of society.

    1. Thanks Kan. The question is how many people visit these ‘lesser’ monuments who cannot afford to pay more? They could always have free or discounted admission for school children.

  13. I love the commentaries you give on these important historical sites. I suppose we could go to my good friend Wikipedia but somehow don’t do that so to see the pics and the commentary is always helpful. I felt bad when visiting some of those sites to see gems missing from where they were originally implanted in marble walls or floors. That kind of vandalism is unforgivable! I’m not sure if you’ve done one on the Mysore palace. I enjoyed my visits there.

    1. No I have not done a post on the Mysore Palace Ian. We visited many years ago and my photos are long lost 🙂 We have friends living there and do visit them, but I haven’t bothered to brave the crowds at the palace since. Shall make the effort on my next visit.

    1. Can’t imagine why Delhi isn’t given due importance as a tourist destination Jeff. Perhaps it is relative to the biggies such as the Taj Mahal and the Rajasthan sights. But the city really is a treasure trove of historic monuments.

  14. that ceiling is stunning. Dalrymple is in this case as overbown as his description – you’re right. It is a lovely place in its own right. And thank you for the gorgeous photos!

  15. The world’s greatest monuments seem to always be one of the three: church/mosque/temple, palace, and tomb. As for the latter, India certainly has a fair share of impressive tombs, including the one of Safdarjung, regardless what Dalrymple said. It’s good to know that the ASI is starting to pay attention to this forgotten heritage.

    1. Delhi alone is littered with tombs Bama. Would love to spend another week there sifting through the layers of history.

  16. It’s a great pleasure to visit such a beautiful structure and see it through your eyes. Thanks for the pictures and the explanations.

  17. I !thought it was Humayun’s at first glance. It is beautiful in its way, not everywhere can have the same glamour can it? The plasterwork is amazing and the whole place just needs a little love, I hope it gets the care it deserves.

  18. look at all that architect… here is a thought all those building built in that time are STILL existing and rock solid.. how come the buildings etc built now in modern day with all the modern facilities and help fall every now and then 🙂

    1. The history is what makes these sights fascinating for me as well Pauline. And there is no dearth of it in a place like Delhi.

  19. Beautiful architecture and work, yet what struck me was that nobody was there … actually sad. Thanks for the journey, explanation, and beautiful images.

  20. I saw only beauty Madhu. The plasterwork is amazing. Beauty is sometimes even more pronounced because of the imperfections. Sad that some people don’t see or understand that fact.

    1. So true Jo. Stating that it is imperfect is one thing. But denigrating it with so many pompous adjectives I thought was quite unnecessary 🙂

  21. Hi Madhu,
    At first glance it looks very magnificent, and it makes me curious about the circumstances and the people who built this. I think a flaw or two, whether we are talking about a person’s character or architecture, makes an even better story! Thanks so much for sharing it, as you always do, with great style and beauty.

  22. Ornate, yet still lovely. It would be great if the dead could be honored thru living memorials to allow these structures to be inhabited by those who struggle in this exotic location.

    1. That is a great idea in principle Judy. But choosing who gets to live where would be quite a task! There would be status involved. And then religion and politics would have to add their two penny bits 🙂

  23. It is strange how such a beautiful structure can be devoid of visitors – the pictures really convey a mood of neglect. Dalrymple’s Victorian prudishness is just snide and off-putting… yes it was unfinished and not quite Humayun’s Tomb, but I think there is something very charming about the building’s imperfections. Given those tumultuous times, you can’t fault the resourcefulness of the architect and craftsmen who worked on the tomb.

  24. It kind of resemble Taj Mahal. There are so many beautiful places like this in India. But all the songs and scenes in Indian movie are shot outside India…sad

Let me know what you think

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s